Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 91.3 | 77.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 12, 11 | -- |
| 2021-03-19 | 2017-06-29 |
| 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 6.15 x 3.00 x 0.24 inches |
| 6.67 ounces | 5.11 ounces |
| -- | Gold, Gray and Silver |
| Plastic and Plastic | Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 200.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 401 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 (8 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 626 8953 Pro chipset |
| Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 506 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 720 x 480 (480 fps) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A52 5G has a global score of 91.3, which is better than Moto Z2 Play's score of 77.4. The Galaxy A52 5G is a notably newer device than Moto Z2 Play, although it's incredibly thicker and notably heavier. The Samsung Galaxy A52 5G has a little better performance than Moto Z2 Play, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Samsung Galaxy A52 5G also has a higher amount of RAM memory.
The Galaxy A52 5G counts with a slightly better looking display than Moto Z2 Play, because it has a bit higher 1080 x 2400 resolution, a just a little greater display pixel density and a larger display. Galaxy A52 5G features a slightly bigger storage for apps and games than Moto Z2 Play, because although it has a slot for an SD memory card that holds 976 GB smaller, it also counts with 128 GB internal storage capacity.
The Galaxy A52 5G takes much clearer pictures and videos than Moto Z2 Play, because although it has a smaller aperture, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution and the same video frame rates, the Galaxy A52 5G also counts with a camera in the back with much more mega-pixels. The Samsung Galaxy A52 5G features a much better battery life than Motorola Moto Z2 Play, because it has a 4500mAh battery size against 3000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.