Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 91.3 | 77.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 12, 11 | Android 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo |
| 2021-03-19 | 2018-08-16 |
| 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 6.16 x 3.01 x 0.27 inches |
| 6.67 ounces | 5.50 ounces |
| -- | 16 777 216 |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 297.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 (8 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A52 5G is much better than Motorola Moto Z3, getting a 91.3 score against 77.6. The Galaxy A52 5G construction is a lot newer, but somewhat thicker and somewhat heavier than the Motorola Moto Z3. Both of these devices use Android OS (operating system), but Galaxy A52 5G has the previous 12 version and Motorola Moto Z3 has Android 9.0 Pie version.
Motorola Moto Z3 has just a bit better processing power than Samsung Galaxy A52 5G, although it has less RAM, they both have the same number of cores. Moto Z3 has a screen that is very similar to the screen in Samsung Galaxy A52 5G, although the Moto Z3 has a little lower resolution of 1080 x 2160px, a bit smaller display and a bit lower screen density.
Galaxy A52 5G captures greater videos and photos than Moto Z3, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality and the same 30 fps video frame rate, the Galaxy A52 5G also has a way bigger back camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors, a lot more megapixels back facing camera and a larger diafragm aperture.
The Galaxy A52 5G has slightly more storage for games and applications than Moto Z3, because although it has a slot for SD memory cards that supports a maximum of 1 TB against 1,95 TB, it also counts with more internal storage. The Galaxy A52 5G has a very superior battery duration than Motorola Moto Z3, because it has a 4500mAh battery size against 3000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.