Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 91.3 | 81.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 12, 11 | -- |
| 2021-03-19 | 2021-01-14 |
| 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 6.54 x 3.00 x 0.39 inches |
| 6.67 ounces | 7.48 ounces |
| -- | Frosted silver and Volcanic grey |
| Plastic and Plastic | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 395.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | LTPS |
| 405 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 (8 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset |
| Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 11 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy A52 5G is better than the Motorola One 5G Ace, with a general score of 91.3 against 81.6. Even when the Galaxy A52 5G and the Motorola One 5G Ace were released only a few months apart, the Galaxy A52 5G is lighter and thinner. Samsung Galaxy A52 5G counts with just a little better hardware performance than Motorola One 5G Ace, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy A52 5G also has a higher amount of RAM memory.
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G features a bit more vivid display than Motorola One 5G Ace, because although it has a bit smaller display, and they both have an equal 1080 x 2400 resolution, the Samsung Galaxy A52 5G also counts with a just a little greater pixel quantity per inch of display. Galaxy A52 5G shoots much clearer photographs and videos than Motorola One 5G Ace, because although it has a tinier camera aperture which is not so good for capturing photographs or videos in poorly lited environments, and they both have the same 30 fps video frame rates and the same (4K) video resolution, the Galaxy A52 5G also counts with a lot higher 64 mega pixels resolution back camera.
The Galaxy A52 5G features a bigger storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Motorola One 5G Ace, and although they both have an external memory slot that allows a maximum of 1 TB, the Galaxy A52 5G also has 128 GB internal memory capacity. Motorola One 5G Ace counts with a bit longer battery life than Galaxy A52 5G, because it has a 5000mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.