Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 91.3 | 79.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 12, 11 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2021-03-19 | 2019-12-04 |
| 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 6.37 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.67 ounces | 7.05 ounces |
| -- | Dark amber, Deep Sea blue and Fresh orchid |
| Plastic and Plastic | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 350.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 405 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 (8 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset |
| Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G is better than the Motorola One Hyper, having a global score of 91.3 against 79.8. These devices use Android OS (operating system), but the Samsung Galaxy A52 5G has newer 12 version and Motorola One Hyper has Android 11, so it offers lots of additional features and performance optimizations. Samsung Galaxy A52 5G is a newer cellphone, and it is also a little bit thinner and just a little lighter than Motorola One Hyper.
Galaxy A52 5G features just a bit better display than Motorola One Hyper, and although they both have a same size display, the Galaxy A52 5G also has a little bit higher count of pixels per inch in the display and a bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2400px. The Galaxy A52 5G features just a bit bigger memory capacity to store more apps and games than Motorola One Hyper, and although they both have equal 128 GB internal storage capacity, the Galaxy A52 5G also has a slot for SD memory cards that admits up to 1 TB.
The Samsung Galaxy A52 5G features a little faster processing unit than Motorola One Hyper, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy A52 5G also has a larger amount of RAM. The Galaxy A52 5G has a bit superior battery duration than Motorola One Hyper, because it has a 4500mAh battery size.
The Galaxy A52 5G captures just a bit better photographs and videos than Motorola One Hyper, and although they both have the same video frame rates, a back facing camera with a 64 megapixels and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the Galaxy A52 5G also has a bigger aperture to take better low light photography and video.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.