Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 91.3 | 80.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 12, 11 | -- |
| 2021-03-19 | 2019-05-15 |
| 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 6.30 x 2.80 x 0.34 inches |
| 6.67 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| -- | Blue and Brown |
| Plastic and Plastic | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2520 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 405 pixels per inch | 435 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 (8 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9609 chipset |
| Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 3500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A52 5G is much better than the Motorola One Vision, having a 91.3 score against 80.7. The Galaxy A52 5G design is newer and a little thinner, but just a little heavier than the Motorola One Vision. Galaxy A52 5G features a little better processing power than Motorola One Vision, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy A52 5G also has more RAM.
The Motorola One Vision features a bit sharper screen than Galaxy A52 5G, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a just a little better pixels count in each inch in the display and a slightly better resolution of 1080 x 2520px. The Samsung Galaxy A52 5G counts with a slightly bigger memory capacity for apps and games than Motorola One Vision, and although they both have exactly the same internal storage capacity, the Samsung Galaxy A52 5G also has a slot for SD memory cards that allows a maximum of 1 TB.
The Samsung Galaxy A52 5G captures a little bit better pictures and videos than Motorola One Vision, because although it has a smaller aperture, and they both have the same video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the Samsung Galaxy A52 5G also counts with a larger back-facing camera sensor which gives a better photo and video quality and a camera in the back with a much better resolution.
Galaxy A52 5G has longer battery lifetime than Motorola One Vision, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity against 3500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.