Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 91.3 | 87 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 12, 11 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2021-03-19 | 2020-10-02 |
| 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 6.66 x 2.86 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.67 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| -- | Blush gold, Liquid mercury and Polished graphite |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 1400.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2142 x 876 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 373 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 7.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 (8 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.42 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 2800mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A52 5G has a score of 91.3, which is a bit better than the Motorola razr (2020)'s 87 global score. These phones include Android operating system, but Samsung Galaxy A52 5G has a newer 12 version and Motorola razr (2020) has Android 11, so it provides the user lots of additional features and better performance. Even though Samsung Galaxy A52 5G and Motorola razr (2020) were only released 6 months apart, Samsung Galaxy A52 5G's design is a bit lighter but a bit thicker.
The Motorola razr (2020) has a bit better processing unit than Galaxy A52 5G, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Motorola razr (2020) also has a greater amount of RAM. The Galaxy A52 5G features a bit more vivid screen than Motorola razr (2020), because it has a bit bigger screen, a little higher resolution of 1080 x 2400 and a bit better pixel density.
The Galaxy A52 5G counts with a greater storage for applications and games than Motorola razr (2020), because although it has 0 less internal memory, it also counts with a SD card slot that allows a maximum of 1 TB. The Galaxy A52 5G counts with a superior battery performance than Motorola razr (2020), because it has a 61 percent larger battery size.
The Samsung Galaxy A52 5G counts with just a bit better camera than Motorola razr (2020), because although it has a tinier aperture which is not good for low light photography and videos, and they both have the same (4K) video quality and the same video frame rate, the Samsung Galaxy A52 5G also counts with a larger sensor taking more light and vivid colors and a lot more mega-pixels back camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.