Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 91.3 | 81.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 12, 11 | Android 12 |
| 2021-03-19 | 2022-08-18 |
| 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 6.57 x 3.14 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.67 ounces | 7.05 ounces |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 (8 nm) chipset | Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 730 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.42 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 11.11 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 5.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 3500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A52 5G is better than the Motorola razr (2022), with a overall score of 91.3 against 81.1. Despite of the fact the Samsung Galaxy A52 5G is older and just a little thicker than Motorola razr (2022), it's construction is still just a bit lighter. These phones come with the same Android 12 OS, so both of them should give you the same operating system features.
The Motorola razr (2022) counts with a little bit better processing power than Samsung Galaxy A52 5G, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Motorola razr (2022) also has more RAM. Motorola razr (2022) counts with a bit sharper screen than Galaxy A52 5G, because although it has a just a little lower display pixel density, and they both have exactly the same resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels, the Motorola razr (2022) also counts with a quite larger screen.
The Galaxy A52 5G has a superior storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Motorola razr (2022), and although they both have exactly the same internal storage, the Galaxy A52 5G also has a slot for external memory cards that holds up to 1 TB. Galaxy A52 5G features just a bit better camera than Motorola razr (2022), and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality and the same 30 frames per second video frame rates, the Galaxy A52 5G also has a camera with a way better resolution and a bigger aperture.
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G counts with improved battery life than Motorola razr (2022), because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.