Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 91.3 | 79.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 12, 11 | Android 15 |
| 2021-03-19 | 2025-04-24 |
| 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | -- |
| 6.67 ounces | 7.02 ounces |
| Plastic and Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | -- |
| Super AMOLED | LTPO |
| 405 pixels per inch | -- |
| -- | 4500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 5.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 (8 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite SM8750-AB (3 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 830 GPU |
| 9.27 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.42 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | -- |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 7.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 4700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 6.56 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy A52 5G has a score of 91.3, which is much better than the Motorola Razr Ultra (2025)'s general score of 79.2. Both phones in this comparison work with Android operating system, but Galaxy A52 5G has an older 12 version while Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) has Android 15. Samsung Galaxy A52 5G features a very superior CPU than Motorola Razr Ultra (2025), although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores.
Galaxy A52 5G counts with a much sharper screen than Motorola Razr Ultra (2025), although it has a little bit smaller display. Samsung Galaxy A52 5G shoots just a bit better videos and photos than Motorola Razr Ultra (2025), and although they both have the same diafragm aperture, the same video frame rate and the same video quality, the Samsung Galaxy A52 5G also has a back-facing camera with a way better 64 mega-pixels resolution.
Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) has more memory capacity to install applications and games than Galaxy A52 5G, because although it has no slot for an external memory card, it also counts with 512 GB internal storage. Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) has a bit better battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy A52 5G, because it has a 4700mAh battery capacity instead of 4500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.