Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 91.3 | 80.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Nokia |
| Android 12, 11 | Android 10 |
| 2021-03-19 | 2020-11-12 |
| 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 6.77 x 3.09 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.67 ounces | 7.97 ounces |
| -- | Meteor grey |
| Plastic and Plastic | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 700.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | LCD |
| 405 pixels per inch | 387 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 (8 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7225 chipset |
| Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 12.98 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 24.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 12.43 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A52 5G is better than Nokia 8 V 5G UW, with a overall score of 91.3 against 80.3. These devices come with Android OS (operating system), but Galaxy A52 5G has a more recent 12 version while Nokia 8 V 5G UW has Android 10, giving some additional features and a performance increase. Even when the Galaxy A52 5G and Nokia 8 V 5G UW were released with only a couple months difference, the Galaxy A52 5G is a little thinner and somewhat lighter.
The Samsung Galaxy A52 5G has a slightly better looking screen than Nokia 8 V 5G UW, because although it has a little smaller display, and they both have exactly the same resolution of 1080 x 2400, the Samsung Galaxy A52 5G also counts with a little bit more pixels per inch of display. Samsung Galaxy A52 5G features more memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Nokia 8 V 5G UW, because it has more internal storage capacity and a slot for an SD memory card that supports up to 1 TB.
The Nokia 8 V 5G UW counts with a CPU that is just as good as the Samsung Galaxy A52 5G one, both of them have 6 GB of RAM memory and the same number of cores. The Nokia 8 V 5G UW and Samsung Galaxy A52 5G both have extremely similar batteries performance. The Nokia 8 V 5G UW features a bit better camera than Galaxy A52 5G, and although they both have a F1.8 aperture, the same video quality, a same size camera sensor and a back camera with a 64 mega pixels resolution, the Nokia 8 V 5G UW also has higher 60 frames per second video frame rates.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.