Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 91.3 | 80.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Nokia |
| Android 12, 11 | Android 11 |
| 2021-03-19 | 2021-07-29 |
| 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 6.76 x 3.21 x 0.42 inches |
| 6.67 ounces | 10.02 ounces |
| -- | Granite Gre and Ultra Blue |
| Plastic and Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 550.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | -- |
| 405 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 550 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 (8 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 SM4350 chipset |
| Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 460 Gold, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.1 | 10.89 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 4630mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 6.48 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy A52 5G is better than Nokia XR20, getting a score of 91.3 against 80.8. These phones include Android OS (operating system), but Galaxy A52 5G has newer 12 version and Nokia XR20 has Android 11 version, providing you a couple nice extra features and some performance improvements. The Galaxy A52 5G design is noticeably lighter and much thinner than Nokia XR20, although both were only released 4 months apart.
Galaxy A52 5G has a little faster processor than Nokia XR20. Both of them have a 6 GB RAM memory and 8 CPU cores. The Nokia XR20 counts with a bit more vivid screen than Samsung Galaxy A52 5G, because although it has a little bit worse pixels count per display inch, and they both have the same exact resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels, the Nokia XR20 also counts with a quite larger display.
The Galaxy A52 5G takes better photographs and videos than Nokia XR20, and although they both have a F1.8 camera aperture, the Galaxy A52 5G also has a lot better 3840x2160 video quality, a lot more mega pixels camera and a way larger back camera sensor which provides a lot higher image and video quality.
The Galaxy A52 5G features a little bit more memory capacity to install games and applications than Nokia XR20, and although they both have the same 128 GB internal storage capacity, the Galaxy A52 5G also has an external SD slot that admits up to 1 TB. Nokia XR20 has just a little bit longer battery performance than Galaxy A52 5G, because it has a 3 percent greater battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.