Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 91.3 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 12, 11 | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2021-03-19 | 2019-10-16 |
| 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 6.76 x 3.09 x 0.38 inches |
| 6.67 ounces | 7.58 ounces |
| -- | Cyber shade |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 600.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 385 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 (8 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset |
| Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.42 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy A52 5G is a lot better than nubia Red Magic 3S, getting a 91.3 score against 75.8. Both devices in this comparison have Android OS (Operating System), but the Galaxy A52 5G has the previous 12 version and nubia Red Magic 3S has Android 9.0 Pie version. Galaxy A52 5G's design is newer, thinner and somewhat lighter than nubia Red Magic 3S.
Nubia Red Magic 3S has a little faster CPU than Samsung Galaxy A52 5G, and although they both have the same number of cores, the nubia Red Magic 3S also has a higher amount of RAM. Nubia Red Magic 3S counts with a display that is just as good as the Galaxy A52 5G one, because although the nubia Red Magic 3S has a little less pixels per display inch and a bit lower 1080 x 2340 resolution, it also counts with a bit larger display.
The Galaxy A52 5G has a little bit better camera than nubia Red Magic 3S, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is not recommended for shooting photos or videos in low-light environments, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the Galaxy A52 5G also counts with higher 30 fps video frame rates, a camera in the back with a lot higher 64 MP resolution and a larger back camera sensor which provides a higher photo and video quality.
The Galaxy A52 5G counts with a greater memory capacity to store more apps and games than nubia Red Magic 3S, because although it has 0 less internal memory capacity, it also counts with a SD memory card expansion slot that admits up to 1 TB. The nubia Red Magic 3S has a bit better battery life than Galaxy A52 5G, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 4500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.