Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 91.3 | 76.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 12, 11 | Android 10 |
| 2021-03-19 | 2020-09-02 |
| 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 6.64 x 3.07 x 0.38 inches |
| 6.67 ounces | 7.76 ounces |
| -- | Sonic silver |
| Plastic and Plastic | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 579.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 385 pixels per inch |
| -- | 600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 (8 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.42 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 12.32 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A52 5G is better than nubia Red Magic 5S, with a general score of 91.3 against 76.2. These devices include Android operating system, but the Samsung Galaxy A52 5G has a newer 12 version while nubia Red Magic 5S has Android 10 version, counting with a couple nice extra features and a performance increase. The Samsung Galaxy A52 5G is a somewhat lighter and thinner cellphone than the nubia Red Magic 5S, even when both of them were released with only 7 months difference.
Nubia Red Magic 5S has a bit superior processing unit than Galaxy A52 5G, and although they both have the same number of cores, the nubia Red Magic 5S also has more RAM. Nubia Red Magic 5S counts with a bit more vivid display than Galaxy A52 5G, because although it has a bit worse 1080 x 2340 resolution and a just a bit less pixels per inch in the screen, it also counts with a little larger screen.
Galaxy A52 5G counts with a much better memory capacity to install games and applications than nubia Red Magic 5S, and although they both have exactly the same internal memory capacity, the Galaxy A52 5G also has an external SD slot that admits up to 1 TB. The nubia Red Magic 5S and Galaxy A52 5G both feature incredibly similar batteries.
The nubia Red Magic 5S captures a little bit better photographs and videos than Galaxy A52 5G, and although they both have a same resolution back camera, a same size sensor and a F1.8 camera aperture, the nubia Red Magic 5S also has a way better 7680x4320 video quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.