Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 91.3 | 79.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Oppo |
| Android 12, 11 | Android 10 |
| 2021-03-19 | 2020-05-14 |
| 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 6.49 x 2.93 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.67 ounces | 6.60 ounces |
| -- | Ocean |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 3168 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 519 pixels per inch |
| -- | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 (8 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.42 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.1 | 11.77 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 4200mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 6.08 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G has a global score of 91.3, which is better than the OPPO Find X2's 79.7 overall score. Samsung Galaxy A52 5G's construction is newer, but a little thicker and a bit heavier than OPPO Find X2. Both of these phones work with Android OS, but the Samsung Galaxy A52 5G has newer 12 version while OPPO Find X2 has Android 10, providing the user some additional features and performance tweaks.
The OPPO Find X2 features a little better processing power than Galaxy A52 5G, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the OPPO Find X2 also has a larger amount of RAM memory. OPPO Find X2 has a brighter display than Samsung Galaxy A52 5G, because it has a bit bigger display, a higher resolution of 1440 x 3168 pixels and more pixels per display inch.
The Samsung Galaxy A52 5G takes clearer videos and photos than OPPO Find X2, because although it has worse 30 frames per second video frame rate and a smaller aperture which is not favorable for low-light images and video, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the Samsung Galaxy A52 5G also counts with a way more megapixels back-facing camera and a bigger sensor.
Galaxy A52 5G features more memory to install applications and games than OPPO Find X2, because although it has 0 less internal storage, it also counts with a SD memory card expansion slot that admits a maximum of 1 TB. The Samsung Galaxy A52 5G has just a little better battery duration than OPPO Find X2, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.