Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 91.3 | 77.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Oppo |
| Android 12, 11 | Android 10 |
| 2021-03-19 | 2020-05-21 |
| 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 6.28 x 2.85 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.67 ounces | 6.03 ounces |
| -- | Moonlight Black and Starry Blue |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| -- | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 (8 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G chipset |
| Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.42 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 11.66 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 4025mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass and Gyroscope |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A52 5G is much better than OPPO Find X2 Neo, with a overall score of 91.3 against 77.7. Both of these phones come with Android operating system, but the Samsung Galaxy A52 5G has 12 version while OPPO Find X2 Neo has Android 10. Samsung Galaxy A52 5G's design is newer, but just a bit thicker and a bit heavier than OPPO Find X2 Neo.
OPPO Find X2 Neo has a little bit better looking screen than Samsung Galaxy A52 5G. Both have an equal resolution of 1080 x 2400px, the same display pixels density and a screen of the same size. Galaxy A52 5G counts with a better memory for applications, games, photos and videos than OPPO Find X2 Neo, because although it has only 128 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with a SD memory slot that holds a maximum of 1 TB.
OPPO Find X2 Neo counts with a bit better processing unit than Galaxy A52 5G, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the OPPO Find X2 Neo also has a higher amount of RAM memory. The Galaxy A52 5G has a bit superior battery performance than OPPO Find X2 Neo, because it has a 12 percent more battery size.
The Samsung Galaxy A52 5G takes a bit better pictures and videos than OPPO Find X2 Neo, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not good for shooting images or video in low light situations, and they both have the same video frame rates and the same video resolution, the Samsung Galaxy A52 5G also counts with a larger back-facing camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors and a camera with way more mega pixels.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.