Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 91.3 | 83.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Oppo |
| Android 12, 11 | Android 10 |
| 2021-03-19 | 2020-05-14 |
| 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 6.50 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.67 ounces | 7.30 ounces |
| -- | Ocean |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Ceramic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 3168 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 519 pixels per inch |
| -- | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 (8 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.42 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.71 inches (1/1.4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.1 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 4260mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A52 5G has an overall score of 91.3, which is a bit better than the OPPO Find X2 Pro's 83.1 general score. Both phones in this comparison have Android OS, but the Samsung Galaxy A52 5G has a newer 12 version while OPPO Find X2 Pro has Android 10 version. The Samsung Galaxy A52 5G is a newer phone, and it is also just a bit lighter and just a bit thinner than the OPPO Find X2 Pro.
The OPPO Find X2 Pro features a bit superior processing unit than Samsung Galaxy A52 5G, and although they both have the same number of cores, the OPPO Find X2 Pro also has more RAM memory. The OPPO Find X2 Pro has a sharper screen than Samsung Galaxy A52 5G, because it has a little bit bigger display, a higher resolution of 1440 x 3168 pixels and a better pixels density.
The OPPO Find X2 Pro's camera is just as good as the camera in Galaxy A52 5G, because although the OPPO Find X2 Pro has a much less megapixels back-facing camera and a worse (4K) video resolution, it also counts with a larger sensor capturing higher quality videos and pictures and a larger camera aperture to capture better photography and videos in low light environments.
OPPO Find X2 Pro counts with a better memory for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy A52 5G, because although it has no SD memory card expansion slot, it also counts with 512 GB internal memory. The Galaxy A52 5G has just a little bit longer battery performance than OPPO Find X2 Pro, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.