Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 91.3 | 76 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Oppo |
| Android 12, 11 | Android 11 |
| 2021-03-19 | 2021-04-14 |
| 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 6.30 x 2.85 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.67 ounces | 6.49 ounces |
| -- | Galactic Silver and Starlight Black |
| Plastic and Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 975.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1100 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 (8 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SDM865 chipset |
| Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.42 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.1 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A52 5G is much better than the OPPO Find X3 Neo, with a 91.3 score against 76. These devices use Android OS (operating system), but the Galaxy A52 5G has a more recent 12 version while OPPO Find X3 Neo has Android 11 version, giving some additional features and performance enhancements. The Galaxy A52 5G is better than OPPO Find X3 Neo, we must note that it's also just a little bit thicker and a bit heavier.
The OPPO Find X3 Neo has a much better looking screen than Galaxy A52 5G. They have the same exact resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels, the same quantity of pixels per inch in the display and a screen with the same size. Galaxy A52 5G features more memory for games and applications than OPPO Find X3 Neo, because although it has only 128 GB internal storage, it also counts with a slot for external memory cards that holds a maximum of 1 TB.
The OPPO Find X3 Neo features just a bit better hardware performance than Galaxy A52 5G, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the OPPO Find X3 Neo also has a higher amount of RAM. OPPO Find X3 Neo features a battery performance that's very similar to Samsung Galaxy A52 5G's battery life.
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G shoots clearer pictures and videos than OPPO Find X3 Neo, because although it has lower 30 frames per second video frame rate, and they both have the same video quality and a F1.8 aperture, the Samsung Galaxy A52 5G also counts with a back facing camera with lot more MP.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.