Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 91.3 | 79.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 12, 11 | Android 14 |
| 2021-03-19 | 2023-12-11 |
| 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 6.34 x 3.01 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.67 ounces | 6.95 ounces |
| -- | Brave Black, Fantasy Blue, Optimistic Blue and Personality Yellow |
| Plastic and Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 (8 nm) chipset | Exynos 1280 (5 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Mali-G68 GPU |
| 9.27 | 6.12 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.76") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.1 | 11.11 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 9.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A52 5G has a global score of 91.3, which is better than the Galaxy A25 5G's score of 79.9. The Samsung Galaxy A52 5G design has the same thickness than Galaxy A25 5G, but it is a bit lighter. Both phones in our current comparison work with Android operating system, but Samsung Galaxy A52 5G has older 12 version while Galaxy A25 5G has Android 14.
The Galaxy A52 5G has a much faster CPU than Samsung Galaxy A25 5G. Both have a Octa-Core CPU and the same RAM memory amount. The Galaxy A25 5G features a bit better looking screen than Galaxy A52 5G, although it has a little lower resolution of 1080 x 2340 pixels and a bit worse display density, they both have a screen with the same size.
Galaxy A25 5G's storage to store more games and applications is just as good as Galaxy A52 5G's one, they have equal 128 GB internal memory capacity and an external memory card slot that supports a maximum of 1 TB. Samsung Galaxy A52 5G counts with a bit better camera than Samsung Galaxy A25 5G, and although they both have the same video definition, the same 30 frames per second video frame rate and a F1.8 camera aperture, the Samsung Galaxy A52 5G also has a lot larger sensor taking more light and vivid colors and a back facing camera with much more megapixels.
The Samsung Galaxy A25 5G counts with a little better battery duration than Galaxy A52 5G, because it has an 11 percent greater battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.