Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 91.3 | 79.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 12, 11 | -- |
| 2021-03-19 | 2019-03-02 |
| 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 6.24 x 2.94 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.67 ounces | 5.82 ounces |
| -- | Black, Blue and White |
| Plastic and Plastic | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 (8 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7904 chipset |
| Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Mali-G71 MP2 GPU |
| 9.27 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.1 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G is much better than the Galaxy A30, getting a overall score of 91.3 against 79.6. Samsung Galaxy A52 5G is a much newer phone than the Galaxy A30, although it is just a little thicker and somewhat heavier. Samsung Galaxy A52 5G counts with a bit more vivid display than Galaxy A30, because it has a little bit greater pixels density, a little bigger screen and a bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2400px.
The Samsung Galaxy A52 5G has a bit faster processor than Galaxy A30, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Samsung Galaxy A52 5G also has a larger amount of RAM memory. The Samsung Galaxy A52 5G takes much clearer photographs and videos than Galaxy A30, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not recommended for low light photos and video, it also counts with a much bigger sensor taking lot higher quality videos and photographs, a camera with a way better resolution and a way higher (4K) video quality.
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G features much more memory for apps and games than Galaxy A30, because it has 128 GB internal storage and an external SD slot that admits up to 1 TB. The Galaxy A52 5G features just a little better battery life than Samsung Galaxy A30, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.