Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 91.3 | 79.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 12, 11 | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2021-03-19 | 2019-09-20 |
| 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 6.24 x 2.94 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.67 ounces | 5.86 ounces |
| -- | Prism crush black, Prism crush green, Prism crush violet and Prism crush white |
| Plastic and Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1560 x 720 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 268 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 7.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 (8 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7885 chipset |
| Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Mali-G71 MP2 GPU |
| 9.27 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.1 | 9.68 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A52 5G is much better than Galaxy A30s, having a 91.3 score against 79.8. Even though Galaxy A52 5G is newer than the Galaxy A30s, it's heavier and a bit thicker. Both phones in this review have Android OS, but the Galaxy A52 5G has a more recent 12 version while Galaxy A30s has Android 11, so it counts with some nice extra features and better performance.
Galaxy A52 5G has a bit more powerful CPU than Galaxy A30s, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Galaxy A52 5G also has more RAM. Galaxy A52 5G has a much better looking screen than Galaxy A30s, because it has a way higher resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels, a little bigger display and a way greater pixel amount per inch in the display.
The Samsung Galaxy A52 5G has a bit bigger storage to store more games and applications than Galaxy A30s, and although they both have exactly the same internal memory capacity, the Samsung Galaxy A52 5G also has a slot for an SD memory card that allows a maximum of 1 TB. The Galaxy A52 5G counts with a little longer battery duration than Samsung Galaxy A30s, because it has a 13% greater battery size.
The Samsung Galaxy A52 5G shoots greater photos and videos than Galaxy A30s, because although it has a smaller aperture, it also counts with a way higher 64 MP resolution camera in the back and a lot better 3840x2160 video definition.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.