Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 91.3 | 86.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 12, 11 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2021-03-19 | 2019-10-20 |
| 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.67 ounces | 5.86 ounces |
| -- | Prism crush black, Prism crush green, Prism crush violet and Prism crush white |
| Plastic and Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 (8 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset |
| Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 13.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A52 5G is slightly better than Galaxy A50s, having a 91.3 score against 86.6. The Galaxy A52 5G is a newer phone than the Galaxy A50s, but it is somewhat heavier and a little thicker. Both phones in this comparison review have Android OS, but the Galaxy A52 5G has the newer 12 version and Galaxy A50s has Android 10.
Galaxy A50s counts with a little better hardware performance than Galaxy A52 5G. Both of them have 8 processing cores and the same RAM amount. Samsung Galaxy A50s counts with a display that is just as good as Galaxy A52 5G's screen, although the Samsung Galaxy A50s has a little bit worse resolution of 1080 x 2340, a little smaller screen and a just a bit worse pixels density.
Galaxy A52 5G counts with just a bit better camera than Galaxy A50s, and although they both have the same (4K) video quality and the same 30 frames per second video frame rates, the Galaxy A52 5G also has a lot better resolution camera, a bigger aperture to take better photography in low-light situations and a bigger back-facing camera sensor which offers a better image and video quality.
The Galaxy A52 5G has a slightly bigger memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy A50s, and although they both have exactly the same internal memory, the Galaxy A52 5G also has a SD card slot that allows up to 1 TB. The Samsung Galaxy A52 5G has just a little better battery lifetime than Galaxy A50s, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.