Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 91.3 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 12, 11 | -- |
| 2021-03-19 | 2017-01-13 |
| 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 6.17 x 3.06 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.67 ounces | 6.56 ounces |
| -- | Black sky, Blue mist, Gold sand and Peach cloud |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 4) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 386 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 7.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 (8 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7880 chipset |
| Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1900 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Mali-T830 MP3 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 8.88 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.1 | 9.24 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 3600mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 5.6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A52 5G has a global score of 91.3, which is much better than Galaxy A7 (2017)'s 75.8 general score. The Galaxy A52 5G construction is noticeably newer, but just a little bit thicker and just a bit heavier than Galaxy A7 (2017). The Galaxy A52 5G counts with just a bit better screen than Samsung Galaxy A7 (2017), because it has a just a bit more pixels per screen inch, a quite better resolution of 1080 x 2400 and a little bit larger display.
Galaxy A52 5G counts with a much greater memory capacity to install games and applications than Galaxy A7 (2017), because it has 128 GB internal memory and an external memory card slot that supports up to 1 TB. Galaxy A52 5G features a bit superior processor than Samsung Galaxy A7 (2017), and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Galaxy A52 5G also has 3 GB more RAM memory.
The Galaxy A52 5G features a much better camera than Galaxy A7 (2017), because it has a larger diafragm aperture to take better photography in poorly lited environments, a way better 64 megapixels resolution back facing camera and a much higher video quality. Galaxy A52 5G counts with superior battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy A7 (2017), because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity against 3600mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.