Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 91.3 | 76.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 12, 11 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2021-03-19 | 2019-04-26 |
| 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 6.47 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.67 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| -- | Black, Blue, Pink and White |
| Plastic and Plastic | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 299.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 (8 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset |
| Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 3.52 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A52 5G is better than the Samsung Galaxy A70, having a global score of 91.3 against 76.9. Both devices in this review work with Android operating system, but Samsung Galaxy A52 5G has the newer 12 version and Samsung Galaxy A70 has Android 10 version. Even though Samsung Galaxy A52 5G is newer than the Samsung Galaxy A70, it is a little bit thicker and a little heavier.
The Galaxy A52 5G has a bit better performance than Galaxy A70. They have 6 GB of RAM and a Octa-Core CPU. The Galaxy A52 5G counts with a slightly better display than Galaxy A70, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, and they both have the same exact 1080 x 2400 resolution, the Galaxy A52 5G also counts with a quite better quantity of pixels in each inch in the screen.
The Samsung Galaxy A52 5G counts with a bit more storage capacity for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy A70, and although they both have exactly the same 128 GB internal storage capacity, the Samsung Galaxy A52 5G also has a SD memory card expansion slot that allows a maximum of 1 TB. Galaxy A52 5G takes greater photographs and videos than Galaxy A70, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture, and they both have the same video resolution and the same video frame rates, the Galaxy A52 5G also counts with a way larger camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors.
The Galaxy A70's battery duration is very similar to the battery life in Galaxy A52 5G.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.