Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 91.3 | 85.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 12, 11 | -- |
| 2021-03-19 | 2018-11-15 |
| 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 6.40 x 3.03 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.67 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| -- | Bubblegum pink, Caviar black and Lemonade blue |
| Plastic and Plastic | Glass and Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2220 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 392 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 (8 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 SDM660 chipset |
| Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 512 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 24.00 MP + 24.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.1 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 3800mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 5.76 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A52 5G is a bit better than the Samsung Galaxy A9 (2018), having a score of 91.3 against 85.2. The Galaxy A52 5G body is notably newer than Samsung Galaxy A9 (2018)'s, although it's just a little heavier and a bit thicker. The Galaxy A9 (2018) has a processor that's very similar to Galaxy A52 5G's CPU, both of them have 8 cpu cores and the same RAM memory amount.
Galaxy A52 5G counts with just a bit better looking display than Galaxy A9 (2018), because it has a quite bigger display, a bit greater display density and a slightly higher 1080 x 2400 pixels resolution. The Galaxy A52 5G takes better pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy A9 (2018), because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution and the same video frame rate, the Galaxy A52 5G also counts with a much bigger sensor capturing more light and vivid colors and a much higher resolution camera in the back.
The Galaxy A52 5G features just a bit more storage capacity to install applications and games than Samsung Galaxy A9 (2018), and although they both have exactly the same 128 GB internal memory capacity, the Galaxy A52 5G also has a SD memory card expansion slot that holds a maximum of 1 TB. The Samsung Galaxy A52 5G features a little longer battery performance than Galaxy A9 (2018), because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity instead of 3800mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.