Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 91.3 | 78.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 12, 11 | Android 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2021-03-19 | 2017-04-07 |
| 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 6.16 x 3.04 x 0.28 inches |
| 6.67 ounces | 6.07 ounces |
| -- | Blue and Gold |
| Plastic and Plastic | Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 386 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 (8 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 626 8953 Pro chipset |
| Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 506 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.1 | 9.24 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G has an overall score of 91.3, which is better than the Samsung Galaxy C7 Pro's global score of 78.4. Even though the Samsung Galaxy A52 5G is notably newer than the Samsung Galaxy C7 Pro, it's thicker and just a little heavier. Both phones in this comparison review include Android operating system, but Samsung Galaxy A52 5G has the previous 12 version while Samsung Galaxy C7 Pro has Android 6.0 Marshmallow.
The Galaxy A52 5G has a slightly better screen than Samsung Galaxy C7 Pro, because it has a quite larger display, a quite higher display pixel density and a bit higher 1080 x 2400 resolution. The Galaxy A52 5G features a much better memory capacity for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy C7 Pro, because it has 128 GB internal storage and an external memory card slot that holds up to 1 TB.
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G counts with a little better hardware performance than Galaxy C7 Pro, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy A52 5G also has a greater amount of RAM memory. Galaxy A52 5G takes greater photographs and videos than Galaxy C7 Pro, because it has a bigger diafragm aperture, a way higher 64 MP resolution camera in the back and a much higher 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution.
The Samsung Galaxy A52 5G features superior battery performance than Samsung Galaxy C7 Pro, because it has a 4500mAh battery size instead of 3300mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.