Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 91.3 | 88.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 12, 11 | Android 11 |
| 2021-03-19 | 2021-02-22 |
| 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 6.45 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches |
| 6.67 ounces | 7.69 ounces |
| -- | Laser Blue, Laser Green and Laser Grey |
| Plastic and Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 405 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 420 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 (8 nm) chipset | Exynos 9825 chipset |
| Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Cortex-A55, 7 nm (Quad-Core 2730 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | ARM Mali-G76 MP12 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.1 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 7000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 8.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A52 5G is slightly better than Samsung Galaxy F62, having a 91.3 score against 88.1. Galaxy A52 5G's body is somewhat lighter and somewhat thinner than the Samsung Galaxy F62, even though they were released only a couple months apart. Both of these phones come with Android OS, but the Galaxy A52 5G has a newer 12 version while Samsung Galaxy F62 has Android 11 version, so it provides you some nice extra features and performance enhancements.
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G and Galaxy F62 both count with really similar CPUs, and although the Galaxy F62 has an inferior number of cores , they both have a 6 GB RAM. Galaxy F62 has just a bit better looking screen than Galaxy A52 5G, because although it has a little lower display pixels density, and they both have exactly the same 1080 x 2400 resolution, the Galaxy F62 also counts with a little bit bigger screen.
The Samsung Galaxy A52 5G has just a bit better camera than Galaxy F62. They have a same size camera aperture, the same 3840x2160 video resolution, a same resolution camera, a same size sensor and the same 30 fps video frame rate. The Samsung Galaxy A52 5G and the Samsung Galaxy F62 count with very similar storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos, both of them have exactly the same 128 GB internal storage capacity and a slot for an SD memory card that supports up to 1 TB.
Galaxy F62 counts with a really longer battery performance than Samsung Galaxy A52 5G, because it has a 7000mAh battery capacity instead of 4500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.