Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 91.3 | 97.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 12, 11 | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2021-03-19 | 2019-09-27 |
| 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 6.33 x 4.64 x 0.27 inches |
| 6.67 ounces | 9.74 ounces |
| -- | Cosmos black and Space silver |
| Plastic and Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 1980.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 7.3 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2152 x 1536 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 362 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 (8 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.42 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 4380mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Fold has a global score of 97.6, which is slightly better than Galaxy A52 5G's 91.3 general score. Both phones in this comparison review come with Android OS (operating system), but the Samsung Galaxy Fold has newer 9.0 Pie version and Galaxy A52 5G has Android 12 version. The Samsung Galaxy Fold body is thinner than Galaxy A52 5G, although it's incredibly heavier and was released just a little further than a year before.
Samsung Galaxy Fold has a little better hardware performance than Galaxy A52 5G, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Samsung Galaxy Fold also has 6 GB more RAM. The Galaxy A52 5G has a bit sharper display than Samsung Galaxy Fold, because although it has a little worse 1080 x 2400px resolution and a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a bit more pixels per inch in the screen.
Galaxy A52 5G takes much clearer photographs and videos than Galaxy Fold, because although it has slower 30 frames per second video frame rates and a smaller diafragm aperture which is not recommended for low-light photography, and they both have the same (4K) video definition, the Galaxy A52 5G also counts with a way more mega pixels camera and a way bigger sensor capturing more light and vivid colors.
The Galaxy Fold features a bigger storage for applications and games than Samsung Galaxy A52 5G, because although it has no SD extension slot, it also counts with 512 GB internal storage capacity. The Samsung Galaxy A52 5G has just a bit longer battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy Fold, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.