Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 91.3 | 78.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 12, 11 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo |
| 2021-03-19 | 2019-02-05 |
| 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 6.16 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.67 ounces | 6.56 ounces |
| -- | Charcoal black and Ocean blue |
| Plastic and Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 405 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 (8 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7904 chipset |
| Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Mali-G71 MP2 GPU |
| 9.27 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 12.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.1 | 9.02 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy A52 5G is much better than the Samsung Galaxy M20, having a general score of 91.3 against 78.9. These phones use Android OS, but the Galaxy A52 5G has a newer 12 version and Samsung Galaxy M20 has Android 10, so it counts with lots of additional features and performance optimizations. The Galaxy A52 5G is a a lot newer and just a little bit thinner phone than the Samsung Galaxy M20, although it is also just a little bit heavier.
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G counts with just a little better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy M20, and although they both have 8 cores, the Samsung Galaxy A52 5G also has 2 GB more RAM. The Galaxy A52 5G features a little more vivid screen than Galaxy M20, because although it has a just a bit worse screen pixels density, it also counts with a slightly higher 1080 x 2400 resolution and a little bigger screen.
The Galaxy A52 5G has a greater camera than Galaxy M20, because it has a much higher (4K) video definition, a much larger sensor capturing more light and vivid colors, a larger aperture for better low light images and a much higher resolution camera in the back. The Galaxy A52 5G has a much greater memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy M20, because it has 128 GB internal memory and an external memory card slot that allows up to 1 TB.
Galaxy M20 features a bit better battery life than Samsung Galaxy A52 5G, because it has a 5000mAh battery size instead of 4500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.