Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 91.3 | 82.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 12, 11 | Android 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo |
| 2021-03-19 | 2019-03-07 |
| 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 6.26 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.67 ounces | 6.14 ounces |
| -- | Black and Blue |
| Plastic and Plastic | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 394 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 (8 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7904 chipset |
| Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Mali-G71 MP2 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.1 | 9.13 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy A52 5G is better than Galaxy M30, having a overall score of 91.3 against 82.4. The Galaxy A52 5G body has the same thickness than the Galaxy M30, but it is just a little heavier. These devices work with Android OS (Operating System), but Galaxy A52 5G has 12 version while Galaxy M30 has Android 9.0 Pie version.
The Galaxy A52 5G has a bit more powerful processing unit than Galaxy M30. They have 6 GB of RAM memory and a Octa-Core processor. The Samsung Galaxy A52 5G features a slightly better looking screen than Galaxy M30, because it has a slightly higher resolution of 1080 x 2400px, a bit higher pixels count per inch of screen and a bit bigger screen.
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G has a greater camera than Galaxy M30, because it has a bigger aperture, a lot larger back camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors, a back-facing camera with way more mega-pixels and a way better video resolution. Galaxy A52 5G has a slightly bigger storage to store more games and applications than Galaxy M30, and although they both have equal internal storage capacity, the Galaxy A52 5G also has a SD memory slot that supports up to 1 TB.
The Galaxy M30 counts with just a little better battery duration than Galaxy A52 5G, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 4500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.