Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 91.3 | 98.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 12, 11 | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| 2021-03-19 | 2020-08-21 |
| 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 6.49 x 3.04 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.67 ounces | 7.34 ounces |
| -- | Mystic black, Mystic bronze and Mystic white |
| Plastic and Plastic | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) and Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1300.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.9 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 494 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 (8 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 13.64 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra is a bit better than Galaxy A52 5G, having a global score of 98.9 against 91.3. These phones come with Android OS, but Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has 13 version while Galaxy A52 5G has Android 12, so it provides the user some nice extra features and increased performance. Although the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra and Galaxy A52 5G were only released with a few months difference, Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra's design is a bit thinner but a little heavier than Galaxy A52 5G.
Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a bit more vivid display than Samsung Galaxy A52 5G, because it has a little bit more pixels per inch in the display, a better resolution of 1440 x 3088px and a bit larger screen. The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a little faster processor than Galaxy A52 5G, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has a higher amount of RAM.
The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra takes much clearer photographs and videos than Galaxy A52 5G, and although they both have a F1.8 aperture, the Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has a lot higher video quality, a back facing camera with a lot better 108 mega-pixels resolution and a way bigger back camera sensor which provides a lot higher image and video quality.
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G has a bit bigger memory for applications and games than Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra, and although they both have exactly the same internal memory, the Samsung Galaxy A52 5G also has an external memory slot that holds up to 1 TB. The Galaxy A52 5G and the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra feature incredibly similar battery performance.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.