Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 91.3 | 79.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 12, 11 | Android 5.1 |
| 2021-03-19 | 2015-08-13 |
| 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.67 ounces | 6.03 ounces |
| -- | Black, Gold, Gray and White |
| Plastic and Plastic | Glass; metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 415.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.1 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 (8 nm) chipset | Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset |
| Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 2100 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | ARM Mali-T760 MP8 GPU |
| 9.27 | 8.46 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.42 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 2560 x 1440 (60 fps) (Quad HD / 2K) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.8 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| -- | 336 hours standby time 22 hours talk time |
| 6.32 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A52 5G is better than Samsung Galaxy Note 5, having a 91.3 score against 79.3. The Samsung Galaxy A52 5G construction is newer, but a little thicker and a little bit heavier than Samsung Galaxy Note 5. Both devices in this comparison have Android OS (operating system), but the Samsung Galaxy A52 5G has 12 version while Samsung Galaxy Note 5 has Android 5.1, so it provides you lots of additional features.
The Galaxy Note 5 counts with a much better looking display than Galaxy A52 5G, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a higher resolution of 2560 x 1440 and more pixels per inch of screen. Samsung Galaxy A52 5G features just a little better performance than Samsung Galaxy Note 5, because it has more RAM and a higher number of faster cores.
The Samsung Galaxy A52 5G features a much greater storage capacity to store more apps and games than Samsung Galaxy Note 5, because it has more internal memory and an external memory slot that supports a maximum of 1 TB. Galaxy A52 5G shoots way better photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy Note 5, and although they both have the same video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the Galaxy A52 5G also has a larger aperture for better low light photos and video, a much bigger camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors and a lot better resolution camera in the back.
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G counts with a very superior battery performance than Galaxy Note 5, because it has a 4500mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.