Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 91.3 | 80.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 12, 11 | -- |
| 2021-03-19 | 2017-07-07 |
| 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 6.04 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.67 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| -- | Black, Blue, Gold and Silver |
| Plastic and Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 611.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 (8 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 8 Octa 8890 chipset |
| Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Exynos M1and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Mali-T880 MP12 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.1 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 3200mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G is better than the Galaxy Note Fan Edition, getting a global score of 91.3 against 80.4. Although Samsung Galaxy A52 5G is extremely newer than Galaxy Note Fan Edition, it is somewhat heavier and just a bit thicker. Galaxy Note Fan Edition and Samsung Galaxy A52 5G count with extremely similar CPUs, and although the Galaxy Note Fan Edition has a lower amount of RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core CPU.
Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition features a bit better looking screen than Galaxy A52 5G, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a higher 1440 x 2560 resolution and a greater pixels quantity per inch of screen. Samsung Galaxy A52 5G counts with a lot better camera than Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is worse for low-light captures and videos, and they both have the same video frame rates and the same video definition, the Samsung Galaxy A52 5G also counts with a much higher 64 mega-pixels resolution camera and a much larger sensor providing a way higher image quality.
Galaxy A52 5G features a way bigger storage capacity to store more apps and games than Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because it has 64 GB more internal memory and a slot for an external memory card that holds a maximum of 1 TB. The Samsung Galaxy A52 5G counts with a really longer battery duration than Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because it has a 41% larger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.