Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 91.3 | 77.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 12, 11 | Android 4.4.2 |
| 2021-03-19 | 2013-09-25 |
| 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 5.95 x 3.12 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.67 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| -- | Black, Pink and White |
| Plastic and Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 386 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 7.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 (8 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 chipset |
| Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 330 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDHC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 9.46 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 31.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Micro SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 3200mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy A52 5G has a general score of 91.3, which is much better than the Samsung Galaxy Note3's general score of 77.7. Galaxy A52 5G's body has the same thickness than the Samsung Galaxy Note3, but it's somewhat heavier. Both devices in this review include Android operating system, but the Galaxy A52 5G has older 12 version while Samsung Galaxy Note3 has Android 4.4.2 version.
The Galaxy A52 5G has a bit superior processing unit than Samsung Galaxy Note3, because it has more RAM memory and a greater number of cores (but slower). Galaxy A52 5G counts with a little sharper display than Samsung Galaxy Note3, because it has a quite larger display, a quite better 1080 x 2400 resolution and a little bit greater count of pixels per inch of screen.
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G takes a lot better pictures and videos than Galaxy Note3, and although they both have the same (4K) video resolution and the same 30 frames per second video frame rate, the Samsung Galaxy A52 5G also has a much bigger back-facing camera sensor capturing lot better quality videos and photos, a back facing camera with way more mega-pixels and a larger diafragm aperture for better images and video in low light environments.
The Galaxy A52 5G has a superior storage capacity for games and applications than Galaxy Note3, because it has an external memory slot that admits up to 1 TB and 64 GB more internal storage capacity. The Galaxy A52 5G counts with a way better battery duration than Samsung Galaxy Note3, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity against 3200mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.