Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 91.3 | 83 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 12, 11 | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2021-03-19 | 2017-09-15 |
| 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 6.40 x 2.94 x 0.34 inches |
| 6.67 ounces | 6.88 ounces |
| -- | Deep Sea blue, Maple gold, Midnight black and Orchid gray |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 440.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 522 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 (8 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G is much better than Samsung Galaxy Note8, having a overall score of 91.3 against 83. The Samsung Galaxy A52 5G is a a lot newer cellphone, and it is also just a little bit thinner and just a bit lighter than Samsung Galaxy Note8. Both of these phones use Android OS (operating system), but the Samsung Galaxy A52 5G has 12 version and Samsung Galaxy Note8 has Android 9.0 Pie.
Samsung Galaxy Note8 counts with a bit better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy A52 5G. They have the same RAM memory amount and 8 cpu cores. The Galaxy Note8 counts with a bit better screen than Samsung Galaxy A52 5G, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with more pixels per screen inch and a higher resolution of 1440 x 2960px.
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G has a way bigger memory to install applications and games than Galaxy Note8, because it has more internal storage and an external memory card slot that admits a maximum of 1 TB. The Galaxy A52 5G features greater battery performance than Galaxy Note8, because it has a 4500mAh battery size against 3300mAh.
The Galaxy A52 5G shoots greater photos and videos than Galaxy Note8, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is not favorable for capturing pictures and video in low-light situations, and they both have the same video definition and the same video frame rate, the Galaxy A52 5G also counts with a camera with a much higher resolution and a lot larger back-facing camera sensor.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.