Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 91.3 | 88.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 12, 11 | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2021-03-19 | 2019-03-08 |
| 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 5.90 x 2.77 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.67 ounces | 5.54 ounces |
| -- | Flamingo pink, Prism black, Prism blue, Prism green and Prism white |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 281.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 3040 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 551 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 (8 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 3400mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 5.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G is slightly better than the Galaxy S10, having a 91.3 score against 88.3. Samsung Galaxy A52 5G's design is way newer, but heavier and just a little thicker than the Galaxy S10. Both phones in our current comparison include Android OS, but the Samsung Galaxy A52 5G has the newer 12 version while Galaxy S10 has Android 11.
Galaxy S10 has a bit sharper display than Galaxy A52 5G, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a better 1440 x 3040 resolution and a better pixels number per inch in the display. Samsung Galaxy A52 5G features a little bit better storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy S10, and although they both have equal 128 GB internal memory capacity, the Samsung Galaxy A52 5G also has a slot for external memory cards that holds a maximum of 1 TB.
The Galaxy S10 counts with a bit faster processor than Galaxy A52 5G, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Galaxy S10 also has a greater amount of RAM memory. The Galaxy A52 5G has better battery life than Samsung Galaxy S10, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity. Samsung Galaxy A52 5G has a superior camera than Galaxy S10, because although it has a tinier aperture and lower 30 frames per second video frame rates, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition, the Samsung Galaxy A52 5G also counts with a lot larger camera sensor providing a much better image quality and a camera with way more megapixels.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.