Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 91.3 | 93.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 12, 11 | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2021-03-19 | 2019-05-16 |
| 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 6.40 x 3.04 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.67 ounces | 6.98 ounces |
| -- | Crown silver, Majestic black and Royal gold |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 342.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 3040 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 502 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 (8 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.42 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S10 5G is a little bit better than Galaxy A52 5G, with a 93.6 score against 91.3. The Galaxy S10 5G body is just a bit thinner than Galaxy A52 5G, but it's just a little heavier and was released around 22 months before. Both devices in our current comparison work with Android operating system, but the Galaxy S10 5G has the older 11 version while Galaxy A52 5G has Android 12 version.
The Samsung Galaxy S10 5G counts with a little bit better display than Samsung Galaxy A52 5G, because it has a quite greater screen pixel density, a higher 1440 x 3040 pixels resolution and a little bit bigger display. The Galaxy A52 5G counts with a quite bigger storage capacity to store more games and applications than Samsung Galaxy S10 5G, because although it has less internal storage capacity, it also counts with a slot for an SD memory card that allows a maximum of 1 TB.
Samsung Galaxy S10 5G counts with a bit better CPU than Galaxy A52 5G, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Samsung Galaxy S10 5G also has a higher amount of RAM memory. Samsung Galaxy A52 5G captures much clearer videos and photos than Galaxy S10 5G, because although it has a tinier aperture which is worse for shooting images or video in low light situations and worse video frame rates, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the Samsung Galaxy A52 5G also counts with a much more mega-pixels back-facing camera and a much bigger camera sensor shooting much higher quality videos and photographs.
The Galaxy S10 5G features a battery lifetime that is just as good as the battery performance in Samsung Galaxy A52 5G.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.