Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 91.3 | 94.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 12, 11 | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| 2021-03-19 | 2020-03-06 |
| 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 5.97 x 2.72 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.67 ounces | 5.78 ounces |
| -- | Cloud blue, Cloud pink, Cosmic grey and Cosmic white |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 3200 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 566 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 (8 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 10.78 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S20 has a global score of 94.8, which is just a bit better than Galaxy A52 5G's score of 91.3. Both phones in our current comparison use Android operating system, but Samsung Galaxy S20 has the newer 13 version while Galaxy A52 5G has Android 12 version, so it provides the user a couple additional features and improved performance. Samsung Galaxy S20 is an older phone than the Galaxy A52 5G, but Samsung was able to build it a little thinner and somewhat lighter anyway.
The Samsung Galaxy S20 features a bit better CPU than Galaxy A52 5G, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Samsung Galaxy S20 also has a larger amount of RAM memory. Galaxy S20 features a bit more vivid display than Galaxy A52 5G, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a greater pixels density and a better resolution of 1440 x 3200.
The Samsung Galaxy A52 5G features slightly more storage capacity to install applications and games than Samsung Galaxy S20, and although they both have equal 128 GB internal storage, the Samsung Galaxy A52 5G also has a slot for external memory cards that allows up to 1 TB. Galaxy A52 5G features a bit better battery performance than Samsung Galaxy S20, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity.
Galaxy A52 5G features a better camera than Galaxy S20, and although they both have a same size sensor, the same video quality and the same camera aperture, the Galaxy A52 5G also has a lot higher resolution camera and better 30 frames per second video frame rate.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.