Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 91.3 | 98 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 12, 11 | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| 2021-03-19 | 2020-03-06 |
| 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 6.57 x 2.99 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.67 ounces | 7.83 ounces |
| -- | Cosmic black and Cosmic grey |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1400.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.9 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 3200 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 509 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 (8 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 13.42 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G is a bit better than the Galaxy A52 5G, with a 98 score against 91.3. Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G's construction is older, heavier and just a little bit thicker than Galaxy A52 5G. Both of these devices come with Android operating system, but the Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a more recent 13 version and Galaxy A52 5G has Android 12 version, providing the user a couple additional features.
The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G features a bit superior processing unit than Galaxy A52 5G, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also has a greater amount of RAM memory. The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G counts with a little bit better looking display than Samsung Galaxy A52 5G, because it has a little bigger display, a greater pixel count in each inch in the display and a better 1440 x 3200 resolution.
The Samsung Galaxy A52 5G features a slightly bigger storage for applications and games than Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G, and although they both have equal 128 GB internal memory capacity, the Samsung Galaxy A52 5G also has a SD card slot that admits up to 1 TB. Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a much better camera than Galaxy A52 5G, because although it has a smaller sensor taking worse quality pictures and videos, and they both have a same size camera aperture, the Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also counts with a way higher video quality and a back facing camera with much more mega-pixels.
The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has just a bit longer battery life than Galaxy A52 5G, because it has a 5000mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.