Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 91.3 | 93.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 12, 11 | Android 13, 12 |
| 2021-03-19 | 2022-02-25 |
| 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 5.75 x 2.78 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.67 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| -- | Green, Phantom Black, Pink Gold and White |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 799.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 422 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | Multi-touch |
| 8.1 | 9.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 (8 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Quad-Core 3000 MHz + Quad-Core 1800 MHz processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 730 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.42 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 23.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 12.43 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 3700mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 5.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S22 is just a bit better than the Galaxy A52 5G, having a score of 93.4 against 91.3. The Samsung Galaxy S22 is a newer phone, and it is also lighter and a bit thinner than the Galaxy A52 5G. Both of these phones use Android operating system, but the Samsung Galaxy S22 has the newer 13 version while Galaxy A52 5G has Android 12, so it provides you some extra features and some performance improvements.
The Galaxy S22 counts with a bit superior processing unit than Galaxy A52 5G, and although they both have 8 cores, the Galaxy S22 also has a larger amount of RAM. Galaxy S22 has a way better looking screen than Galaxy A52 5G, because although it has a little bit smaller display and a bit worse 1080 x 2340px resolution, it also counts with a little more pixels per screen inch.
The Samsung Galaxy A52 5G counts with a lot bigger storage capacity for apps and games than Samsung Galaxy S22, and although they both have exactly the same internal storage, the Samsung Galaxy A52 5G also has a slot for an external memory card that holds up to 1 TB. The Samsung Galaxy A52 5G features superior battery lifetime than Galaxy S22, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
The Galaxy S22 captures slightly better pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy A52 5G, because although it has a back-facing camera with a way worse 50 mega pixels resolution, and they both have a same size camera aperture, the Galaxy S22 also counts with a much higher video quality and a larger back-facing camera sensor which gives a better photo and video quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.