Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 91.3 | 95.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 12, 11 | Android 13, 12 |
| 2021-03-19 | 2022-02-25 |
| 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 6.43 x 3.07 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.67 ounces | 8.08 ounces |
| -- | Burgundy, Green, Phantom Black and White |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1200.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 501 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1750 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 9.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 (8 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Quad-Core 2800 MHz + Quad-Core 1800 MHz processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 730 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.42 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 23.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 13.75 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy S22 Ultra has a global score of 95.4, which is just a bit better than Galaxy A52 5G's 91.3 score. Both devices in this comparison review have Android OS (Operating System), but Galaxy S22 Ultra has the newer 13 version and Galaxy A52 5G has Android 12 version. Galaxy S22 Ultra's design is newer than the Galaxy A52 5G's, although it is a little bit thicker and somewhat heavier.
The Galaxy S22 Ultra counts with a much better looking screen than Galaxy A52 5G, because it has a quite better screen pixels density, a bit bigger screen and a higher resolution of 1440 x 3088px. Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra counts with a bit faster CPU than Galaxy A52 5G, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra also has 2 GB more RAM.
The Galaxy S22 Ultra counts with a much better camera than Galaxy A52 5G, and although they both have the same aperture, the Galaxy S22 Ultra also has a way bigger sensor, a much better 7680x4320 video quality and a camera with a much better 108 MP resolution. The Galaxy A52 5G has a superior storage capacity to store more apps and games than Galaxy S22 Ultra, and although they both have exactly the same internal storage, the Galaxy A52 5G also has a slot for an SD memory card that supports a maximum of 1 TB.
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra has a bit superior battery life than Samsung Galaxy A52 5G, because it has an 11 percent bigger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.