Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 91.3 | 82.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 12, 11 | Android 14 |
| 2021-03-19 | -- |
| 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | -- |
| 6.67 ounces | -- |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 800.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 416 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 (8 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 chipset |
| Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 9.27 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.42 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 24.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 12.54 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G is much better than the Samsung Galaxy S25, having a 91.3 score against 82.6. Both phones in this review come with Android OS, but the Samsung Galaxy A52 5G has the older 12 version while Samsung Galaxy S25 has Android 14 version. The Galaxy A52 5G features a much greater performance than Galaxy S25, although it has a smaller amount of RAM, they both have 8 processing cores.
The Galaxy S25 features a more vivid display than Galaxy A52 5G, because although it has a quite smaller screen and a quite lower resolution of 1080 x 2340 pixels, it also counts with a just a little greater quantity of pixels in each screen inch. The Galaxy A52 5G features a much greater storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy S25, and although they both have equal 128 GB internal storage, the Galaxy A52 5G also has a slot for an external memory card that allows a maximum of 1 TB.
The Galaxy A52 5G counts with a bit longer battery life than Samsung Galaxy S25, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity. The Galaxy S25 shoots a bit better pictures and videos than Galaxy A52 5G, because although it has a way worse resolution back facing camera, and they both have a F1.8 diafragm aperture, the Galaxy S25 also counts with a much higher video quality and a bigger sensor.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.