Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 91.3 | 90.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 12, 11 | Android 14 |
| 2021-03-19 | -- |
| 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | -- |
| 6.67 ounces | -- |
| Plastic and Plastic | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Titanium |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 501 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 10.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 (8 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 chipset |
| Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 9.27 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.42 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 200.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 24.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 14.74 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A52 5G has a score of 91.3, which is slightly better than the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra's general score of 90.7. Both of these phones use Android OS, but the Galaxy A52 5G has the previous 12 version and Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra has Android 14 version. The Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra counts with a lot better screen than Galaxy A52 5G, because it has a higher 1440 x 3088px resolution, a little bit bigger screen and a just a bit greater amount of pixels per display inch.
The Samsung Galaxy A52 5G counts with a lot better performance than Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra, although it has a lower amount of RAM, they both have a Octa-Core CPU. Galaxy A52 5G counts with a greater memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy S25 Ultra, because although it has 0 less internal memory capacity, it also counts with a SD card slot that supports up to 1 TB.
The Galaxy S25 Ultra captures a lot better videos and photos than Galaxy A52 5G, because it has a larger aperture for better images and video in low-light environments, a much more mega-pixels back facing camera, a way higher video resolution and a much bigger sensor shooting much better quality videos and photographs.
The Galaxy S25 Ultra features just a bit better battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy A52 5G, because it has an 11% greater battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.