Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 91.3 | 78.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 12, 11 | Android 4.4.2 |
| 2021-03-19 | 2014-06-23 |
| 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 5.59 x 2.85 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.67 ounces | 5.11 ounces |
| -- | Black, Blue, Gold and White |
| Plastic and Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 249.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 432 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.1 | 9.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 (8 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset |
| Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 2 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 16 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 6.72 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 2.10 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.1 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| Nano SIM | Micro SIM |
| 10.7 | 7.2 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 2800mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| -- | 390 hours standby time 21 hours talk time |
| 6.32 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A52 5G has a score of 91.3, which is much better than the Samsung Galaxy S5 Plus's 78.1 score. Both of these phones work with Android OS, but the Galaxy A52 5G has 12 version and Samsung Galaxy S5 Plus has Android 4.4.2 version. The Galaxy A52 5G design is much newer, but way heavier and just a little bit thicker than the Samsung Galaxy S5 Plus.
The Samsung Galaxy S5 Plus features a sharper display than Samsung Galaxy A52 5G, because although it has a way smaller display and a little bit worse resolution of 1920 x 1080 pixels, it also counts with a bit higher screen density. The Galaxy A52 5G counts with much more memory to store more apps and games than Galaxy S5 Plus, because it has an external SD slot that holds a maximum of 1 TB and more internal storage.
The Samsung Galaxy S5 Plus counts with a bit faster processing unit than Samsung Galaxy A52 5G, because although it has 4 GB lesser RAM memory and an inferior number of cores , it also counts with an additional graphics processing unit. Galaxy A52 5G has a very superior battery lifetime than Galaxy S5 Plus, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity instead of 2800mAh.
The Samsung Galaxy A52 5G counts with a very superior camera than Galaxy S5 Plus, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality and the same 30 frames per second video frame rates, the Samsung Galaxy A52 5G also has a lot bigger sensor taking much higher quality pictures, a larger aperture to capture better low-light photography and a back camera with way more MP.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.