Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 91.3 | 77.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 12, 11 | Android 4.4.2 |
| 2021-03-19 | 2014-06-23 |
| 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 5.67 x 2.91 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.67 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| -- | Blue and Red |
| Plastic and Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 299.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 432 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.1 | 9.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 (8 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 MSM8974-AC chipset |
| Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 2 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 16 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 6.72 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.1 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| Nano SIM | SIM |
| 10.7 | 7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 2800mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| -- | 390 hours standby time 21 hours talk time |
| 6.32 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A52 5G is much better than the Galaxy S5 Sport, getting a score of 91.3 against 77.8. The Galaxy A52 5G design is newer and just a bit thinner, but also somewhat heavier than the Galaxy S5 Sport. Both phones in this comparison review include Android OS (Operating System), but Galaxy A52 5G has the previous 12 version and Galaxy S5 Sport has Android 4.4.2.
The Samsung Galaxy S5 Sport counts with a bit better performance than Samsung Galaxy A52 5G, because although it has a lower amount of RAM memory and a lower number of cores (although faster), it also counts with a GPU. Galaxy S5 Sport features a more vivid display than Samsung Galaxy A52 5G, because although it has a lot smaller display and a bit lower resolution of 1920 x 1080 pixels, it also counts with a bit higher count of pixels in each inch of screen.
Galaxy A52 5G counts with a greater camera than Galaxy S5 Sport, and although they both have the same 30 fps video frame rate and the same (4K) video definition, the Galaxy A52 5G also has a lot larger camera sensor, a larger aperture to capture better images in poorly lited environments and a back-facing camera with a lot higher resolution.
The Galaxy A52 5G counts with a much better storage capacity for apps and games than Galaxy S5 Sport, because it has an external memory card slot that admits up to 1 TB and 128 GB internal memory capacity. Samsung Galaxy A52 5G features a superior battery performance than Samsung Galaxy S5 Sport, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity against 2800mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.