Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 91.3 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 12, 11 | -- |
| 2021-03-19 | 2016-06-10 |
| 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 5.86 x 2.95 x 0.39 inches |
| 6.67 ounces | 6.53 ounces |
| -- | Camo green, Sandy gold and Titanium gray |
| Plastic and Plastic | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 247.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| -- | 500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 9.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 (8 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.27 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 8.56 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A52 5G has a score of 91.3, which is a lot better than the Samsung Galaxy S7 Active's 75.8 general score. Galaxy A52 5G's design is incredibly newer and somewhat thinner, but also just a bit heavier than the Samsung Galaxy S7 Active. The Samsung Galaxy S7 Active counts with a better looking display than Galaxy A52 5G, because although it has a lot smaller screen, it also counts with a higher quantity of pixels per inch of screen and a better resolution of 1440 x 2560.
The Galaxy A52 5G counts with just a bit better processing power than Samsung Galaxy S7 Active, because it has more RAM and 4 more cpu cores. The Samsung Galaxy A52 5G has a lot better camera than Samsung Galaxy S7 Active, because although it has a tinier aperture which is worse for low light images and video, and they both have the same 30 fps video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 video quality, the Samsung Galaxy A52 5G also counts with a way higher 64 mega pixels resolution back camera.
The Samsung Galaxy A52 5G counts with a much greater memory capacity for games and applications than Galaxy S7 Active, because it has 128 GB internal storage and a SD memory slot that holds a maximum of 1 TB. The Galaxy A52 5G features just a little bit longer battery performance than Samsung Galaxy S7 Active, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.