Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 91.3 | 78.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 12, 11 | Android 8.0 Oreo, 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2021-03-19 | 2016-03-11 |
| 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 5.94 x 2.86 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.67 ounces | 5.54 ounces |
| -- | Black, Black pearl, Coral blue, Gold, Pink gold, Silver and White |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 4) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 336.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 (8 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 8.56 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 3600mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 5.6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G has an overall score of 91.3, which is much better than Galaxy S7 edge's general score of 78.1. Both of these devices work with Android OS (operating system), but Samsung Galaxy A52 5G has the older 12 version and Galaxy S7 edge has Android 8.0 Oreo version. Samsung Galaxy A52 5G's design is incredibly newer than Galaxy S7 edge's, but it's heavier and a little thicker.
The Galaxy S7 edge counts with a little more vivid display than Galaxy A52 5G, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a better screen density and a higher resolution of 1440 x 2560. The Galaxy A52 5G counts with a bit more powerful CPU than Samsung Galaxy S7 edge, because it has 4 more 2200 megahertz cpu cores and more RAM memory.
Galaxy A52 5G features a much bigger memory for games and applications than Galaxy S7 edge, because it has more internal storage and a slot for an SD memory card that allows up to 1 TB. The Galaxy A52 5G captures much better photos and videos than Galaxy S7 edge, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not so good for low-light images and video, and they both have the same video frame rates and the same video definition, the Galaxy A52 5G also counts with a way larger sensor taking lot better quality videos and photographs and a much better 64 mega-pixels resolution back camera.
The Samsung Galaxy A52 5G features better battery performance than Galaxy S7 edge, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.