Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 91.3 | 83.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 12, 11 | -- |
| 2021-03-19 | 2018-03-16 |
| 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 5.81 x 2.70 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.67 ounces | 5.75 ounces |
| -- | Burgundy red, Coral blue, Ice blue, Lilac purple, Midnight black, Sunrise gold and Titanium gray |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 158.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 568 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 (8 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 11.34 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A52 5G is slightly better than Galaxy S9, having a 91.3 score against 83.3. Galaxy A52 5G's design has the same thickness than the Galaxy S9, but it is heavier. The Samsung Galaxy S9 features just a bit better processing power than Galaxy A52 5G, although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores.
Galaxy S9 counts with a little more vivid screen than Samsung Galaxy A52 5G, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a higher resolution of 1440 x 2960px and more pixels per inch of screen. The Galaxy A52 5G features a much better memory capacity for games and applications than Galaxy S9, because it has 128 GB internal memory capacity and a slot for SD memory cards that allows a maximum of 1 TB.
Galaxy A52 5G features a really longer battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy S9, because it has a 50 percent greater battery size. The Galaxy A52 5G captures much clearer photographs and videos than Galaxy S9, because although it has worse 30 frames per second video frame rate and a tinier camera aperture which is not recommended for capturing images and video in low-light environments, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition, the Galaxy A52 5G also counts with a back-facing camera with a way higher resolution and a lot larger back-facing camera sensor which offers a way better photo and video quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.