Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 91.3 | 80.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 12, 11 | Android 8.0 Oreo |
| 2021-03-19 | 2020-04-04 |
| 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 6.24 x 3.18 x 0.56 inches |
| 6.67 ounces | 9.03 ounces |
| -- | Black |
| Plastic and Plastic | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 1105.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED | -- |
| 405 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 (8 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset |
| Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Mali-G72 MP18 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.1 | 8.14 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A52 5G is better than the Galaxy XCover FieldPro, getting a score of 91.3 against 80.1. Both of these phones have Android OS (Operating System), but the Galaxy A52 5G has 12 version while Galaxy XCover FieldPro has Android 8.0 Oreo. The Galaxy A52 5G is a newer phone, and it's also a lot thinner and noticeably lighter than the Galaxy XCover FieldPro.
The Galaxy XCover FieldPro has just a bit better screen than Samsung Galaxy A52 5G, because although it has a much smaller screen, it also counts with a greater amount of pixels per display inch and a higher resolution of 1440 x 2560. Galaxy XCover FieldPro has a bit more powerful processor than Galaxy A52 5G, although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, they both have 8 cpu cores.
The Galaxy A52 5G has a superior memory for applications and games than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because it has a SD extension slot that supports up to 1 TB and 128 GB internal memory. The Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro has a battery lifetime that is very similar to Samsung Galaxy A52 5G's battery life.
Galaxy A52 5G captures a lot better photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture, it also counts with a camera with lot more mega-pixels, a lot higher 3840x2160 video resolution and a way larger sensor.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.