Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 91.3 | 81 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 12, 11 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2021-03-19 | 2020-01-31 |
| 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.39 inches |
| 6.67 ounces | 7.76 ounces |
| -- | Black |
| Plastic and Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 421.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 405 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 (8 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 4050mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy A52 5G is better than Galaxy XCover Pro, getting a overall score of 91.3 against 81. These devices use Android OS, but Galaxy A52 5G has a more recent 12 version while Galaxy XCover Pro has Android 11, providing a lot of extra features. The Galaxy A52 5G is a newer cellphone, and it's also somewhat lighter and somewhat thinner than Galaxy XCover Pro.
Galaxy XCover Pro features a screen that is just as good as the Galaxy A52 5G one, because although the Galaxy XCover Pro has a bit smaller display and a quite lower resolution of 1080 x 2340px, it also counts with a little bit better display pixel density. Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro has a CPU that is just as good as the processor in Galaxy A52 5G, and although the Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro has a smaller amount of RAM memory, they both have 8 cores.
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G features a much better storage capacity to install games and applications than Galaxy XCover Pro, because it has a SD memory card expansion slot that holds up to 1 TB and 128 GB internal memory. The Samsung Galaxy A52 5G captures greater photos and videos than Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not nice for low light photos and video, it also counts with a back camera with way more megapixels, a way larger back-facing camera sensor and a much better 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution.
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G counts with a little longer battery performance than Galaxy XCover Pro, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.