Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 91.3 | 88.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 12, 11 | Android 12, 11, 10 |
| 2021-03-19 | 2020-02-14 |
| 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches |
| 6.67 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| -- | Mirror black and Mirror purple |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 1380.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 (8 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.42 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A52 5G has a general score of 91.3, which is a bit better than the Galaxy Z Flip's global score of 88.5. These phones include the same Android 12 OS (operating system), so they should provide identical OS features. The Galaxy A52 5G construction is newer, but thicker and just a bit heavier than Galaxy Z Flip.
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip counts with a bit better processor than Galaxy A52 5G, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip also has a larger amount of RAM. The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip counts with a little more vivid screen than Galaxy A52 5G, because it has a little bit higher pixels density, a slightly higher resolution of 1080 x 2636px and a little bit larger display.
Galaxy A52 5G counts with a better storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy Z Flip, because although it has just 128 GB internal storage, it also counts with a slot for external memory cards that admits up to 1 TB. Samsung Galaxy A52 5G features improved battery life than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip, because it has a 36% greater battery size.
The Samsung Galaxy A52 5G features a better camera than Galaxy Z Flip, because although it has slower 30 frames per second video frame rate, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution and the same camera aperture, the Samsung Galaxy A52 5G also counts with a camera with way more mega-pixels and a way larger sensor which gives a much higher photo and video quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.