Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 91.3 | 85.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 12, 11 | Android 11 |
| 2021-03-19 | 2021-08-11 |
| 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 6.54 x 2.84 x 0.27 inches |
| 6.67 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| -- | Cream, Lavender and Phantom Black |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 (8 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset |
| Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.42 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.1 | 7.92 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 3300mAh Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G has a global score of 91.3, which is slightly better than the Galaxy Z Flip 3's 85.6 overall score. These phones work with Android OS (Operating System), but the Samsung Galaxy A52 5G has newer 12 version while Galaxy Z Flip 3 has Android 11. Despite being the best in our current comparison, Samsung Galaxy A52 5G is a somewhat thicker and just a little heavier phone than Galaxy Z Flip 3.
The Galaxy Z Flip 3 counts with a little better hardware performance than Galaxy A52 5G, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Galaxy Z Flip 3 also has a greater amount of RAM. The Galaxy Z Flip 3 has a bit more vivid display than Galaxy A52 5G, because it has a slightly better 1080 x 2636 resolution, a just a little higher screen pixels density and a quite larger display.
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G features a way bigger memory for applications and games than Galaxy Z Flip 3, and although they both have exactly the same internal memory capacity, the Samsung Galaxy A52 5G also has an external memory card slot that supports up to 1 TB. Galaxy A52 5G shoots way better videos and photos than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3, and although they both have a same size diafragm aperture, the Galaxy A52 5G also has a much more mega pixels camera.
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G features superior battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3, because it has a 36 percent more battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.